Overview of Presentation:

Pages 19
Views 11
of 19
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Description
1 / 38 Overview of Presentation: Part I: DoBeS Project Languages of Southwest Ambrym Part II: A few facts about Daakie Sound System Basic clause pattern Agreement system Nominal constructions: Possession,
Transcript
1 / 38 Overview of Presentation: Part I: DoBeS Project Languages of Southwest Ambrym Part II: A few facts about Daakie Sound System Basic clause pattern Agreement system Nominal constructions: Possession, relational and transitive nouns Transitivity with verbs Verb serialization Part III: The modal markers 2 / 38 PART I: DoBeS Project: Languages of Southwest Ambrym About the project: July 2009 September 2013, funded by VolkswagenFoundation, site housed at Max Planck for Psycholinguistics, Kilu von Prince (Linguistics) special thanks for in-depth discussion, dissertation Soraya Hosni (Anthropology) upcoming dissertation, kinship. Susanne Fuchs (Phonetics), Lena Karvovskaya (Technical support). Three languages: Daakaka, Daakie, Dalkalaen; also, there was a project on North Ambrym (Michael Franjieh, SOAS, Rausig Found.) Each language ~ 1000 speakers, actively spoken, learned by children, but potential threats (among others, Bislama loans, volcanoes, mobile phones...). Tasks, among others: Documentation of communication (~ 20 hours of transcribed materials): The Language Archive: Grammar, dictionaries: von Prince, A grammar of Daakaka: Text collections in Daakaka, Dalkalaen, Daakie (via Amazon): 3 / 38 Projects of the DoBeS program 4 / 38 Vanuatu / Ambrym: Geography and languages -- population: 290, about 100 languages (Austronesian) -- Melanesian Pidgin English (Bislama) -- English, French Ethnologue on Ambrym: -- Southeast Ambrym -- North Ambrym -- Lonwolwol (now nearly extinct) -- Dakaka (Daakaka) -- Port Vato (Daakie) 5 / 38 Ambrym: Geography and languages North- Ambrym Orkon Lonwolwol Dalkalaen Daakaka Daakie (Port Vato) Southeast- Ambrym 6 / 38 Ambrym: Sand Drawing by Sam Tasso 7 / 38 Tangible results: Daakie Dictionary ( 2000 lemmata) 8 / 38 Tangible results: Custom Story collection The two brothers and the redhead bird Daakie texts: Fables, Fairy Tales, History, Customs, Personal History 9 / 38 Tangible results: Children s book 10 / 38 Tangible results: Bible stories for children In preparation: Translation of Fables by Aesop, European fairytales School books for first alphabetization 11 / 38 Distribution of books in Port Vato, July / 38 DoBeS Project on Southwest Ambrym Public Appearances Exhibition Sanddrawing, Humboldtbox Berlin 13 / 38 Part II: A few facts about Daakie Previously known as Port Vato (Tryon 1976; Ethnologue). About 1000 speakers; larger villages: Lonmei, Port Vato (Langievot), Lalinda. Contact with Daakaka and Dalkalaen to the west; fewer contacts to North Ambrym or Southeast Ambrym. Previous literature: Some information in William Paton, Ambrym (Lonwolwol) grammar, Dissertation Australian National University 1952, published 1971 Word list in Tryon (1976) 14 / 38 Sound System of Daakie / 38 Basic clause pattern, Paradigm of pronouns and subject markers 20 / 38 Paradigm of subject markers, pronouns, and modal markers. 21 / 38 Number marking Elaborate number marking with pronouns and possessives: Singular, Dual, Paucal, Plural see above Uses of dual: When referring to two entities: kolo-m loko kolom van 3.DU-RE walk 3.DU-RE go the two of them walked on When referring to a respected person, e.g. brother of mother, child of sister: Use of paucal: Referring to a group that one identifies with, regardless of size. Use of plural includes impersonal reference, cf. Engl. they, German man, French on 22 / 38 Number requirements of verbs Some verbs have number requirements on their arguments, typically singular/dual vs. paucal/plural. Number requirement on subject argument: pwet / du be there muet / tisi fall down soaa / pisyah arrive Number requirement on object argument: idi / sógo take, hold koselaane / koseleene chase away 23 / 38 Possessive markers Possessive markers: Three classes (a reduced system compared to other languages) mok class: related to the house, to drinks, e.g. mok dyung my mat mok we my water mok vyoh my coconut (for drinking) ok class: related to food, animals, food-related implements e.g. ok meleh my food ok kulu my dog ok yo my knife ok dom my yam / year sok class: the general class for the rest, e.g. sok timaleh my child, sok too my garden, sok tyenem my village Paradigm (sok class): Possessive markers as possessive linkers: dyung me Meri Mary s mat meleh e Meri Mary s food timaleh se Meri Mary s child Possessive marker as conjunction : Meri son John Mary with John 25 / 38 Relational constructions: relational nouns Relational nouns are inflected for possessor Example: nur/nar- child Observe: Inflection similar to possessive marker; hence: possessive markers are general relational nouns; this explains why they precede their noun (sok too my garden, not *too sok), contrary to other modifiers. and it explains the absolute use of possessive markers, e.g. nam idi ok I took mine, I took my food Semantic domains of relational nouns: Kinship terms (with exceptions; naana mama replaces 1 st person singular in laas-) Body parts (with the exception of most inner organs) Bodily excretions There are about 50 relational nouns in the current dictionary. 26 / 38 Relational constructions: Transitive nouns Transitive nouns require a DP that satisfy their argument position: biri popat biri popat kele head.of pig head.of pig that pig s head that pig s head Examples (there are about 70 transitive nouns in the current dictionary): Parts: head, hand, leg, eye, elbow, face, tail, body, belly stem, leaf, root, shoot, branch, fruit, juice, thorn, seed top, core, piece, front, middle, remains one, the other (of two) Collections: bundle, bunch, drop, hole, group, heap Entity coming from origin: voice, offspring, egg, heat (of sun), person (from) Function: rope (e.g. for pigs), place (e.g. for soccer) mother, also big : laasi vanten mother of the man, very big man Example for relational, transitive, absolute noun: biry-on his head mer-an his eye vel-an his hand biri head of mere eye, core of vele hand of birikot head mát eye vyaa hand biri popat kele biryon popat kele that pig s head the head of that pig Transitivization with preposition ne, similar for verbs: da ne ngyo yaapuo soo ne ot yurop blood TR 1.sg my blood man one TR place Europe a man from Europe 27 / 38 Verbs: intransitive, transitive Intransitive / transitive verb pairs: Irregular verb pairs, e.g. en / ane eat min / mini drink pinin / páne roast pyen / vini shoot peap / pepa carry (a child) kii / ili dig gerehe be a liar / gerehe deceive, tee look / lehe see Regular verb pairs, derived with suffix (preposition) ne e.g. lip drip / lipne pour Derived verbs with verb suffixes e.g. kii dig kii-kuu dig out Examples: 28 / 38 Semitransitive verbs and ditransitive verbs But intransitive verbs sometimes occur with an object: Here, kon does not refer to specific corn, rather: they were corn-roasting. Interpretations: páne: λyλx[x roasts y] == transitive reading, objects of type e pinin: a. λpλx y[x roasts y P(y)] semi-transitive reading, objects of type e,t b. λx y[x roasts y] intransitive reading, no object equivalent to leaving P unspecified Not every intransitive verb can be used as semitransitive, e.g. baa fight, but arguments can sometimes be extended, e.g. with preposition mane: Ditransitive verbs: Second object provided with mane 29 / 38 Experiencer verbs Experiencer subjects: Realized as regular subjects: Realized with dummy subjects referring to body parts: 30 / 38 Serial verb constructions Complex verbs, suffixes, sometimes used as separate verbs, no separate inflection ta-bini cut dead kyet-bini bite dead resultative interpretation gum-gare hold tight yep-gare pull-tight intensive interpretation en-lehe eat-see, try syep-lehe cut-see conative interpretation kuoli-mee return come loko-van walk go goal interpretation Aspectual verb serialization, e.g. progressive: du progressive, du continuative, buk first Event-related verb serialization (3 rd sg., predication on event), cf. Davidsonian event argument 31 / 38 Part III: A closer look at modal markers New project: Kilu von Prince, Manfred Krifka: The Expression of Tempus, Aspect, Modality and Polarity in Melanesian Languages MelaTAMP) (DFG, ) Paradigm of modal markers, illustrated with 3 rd plural, 3 rd singular At the root of this system: Distiction Realis / Irrealis (Actualis / Potentialis) Often: Nonfuture (Past / Nonpast) vs. Future distinction Better characterized as (cf. Lichtenberk 1983 on Manam, Roberts 1990 on Amele): event/state taking place or having taken place vs. envisioned or imagined For typological and semantic correlations of the realis / irrealis distinction cf. J.R. Elliott 2002, de Haan 2012 Newly acquired project von Prince / Krifka, MelaTAMP Purpose here: Overview of uses of modal markers in Daakie (Some ideas about modeling the semantics of these markers 32 / 38 Use of modal markers: Realis in non-embedded sentences Ongoing events: Past events: Generic statements: Fictional worlds: 33 / 38 Use of modal markers: Realis in embedded clauses Complement of factive propositional attitude verbs, complementizer: ke Reason clauses: Temporal clauses: 38 Use of modal markers: Potentialis in non-embedded sentences. In commissive clauses: In jussive clauses: In directive clauses (imperatives /necessitives: Give me / You must give me) Future reference with prefix a- to subject marker (in Daakie, not in Daakaka: complementizer ka) desoo: indefinite quantifier in non-realis contexts; in realis contexts: soo one ; cf. Pearce 2010 for Unua 35 / 38 Use of modal markers: Potentialis in embedded clauses Non-factive complement clauses; irrealis complementizer ka, contrast with realis ke. Non-factive temporal clauses, cf. German als / wenn Content of thought often expressed as direct speech. 36 / 38 Use of modal markers: Distal modality Indicating time at which an event happened: Temporal scene setters in discourse: Adjectival predication, restricted to the stem -bo big Content of false thoughts: 37 / 38 Modality in conditional clauses Irrealis in protasis of indicative conditionals, future in apodosis. Distal in protasis of future-oriented conditional, future in apodosis: Distal in protasis and apodosis of counterfactual conditional: 38 / 38 Realis Negation Negation marker -r n negated root clauses: 39 / 38 Negation: -n Negation marker -n in main clauses headed by complementizer sa ka: Negation marker -n in dependent clause, negative-implying embedding verb: Negation concord with marker -n in embedded clauses: 40 / 38 But: n marker can also express deontic necessity! Expression of deontic necessity: Alternative construction, derived from Bislama mas, cf. English must 41 / 38 The Semantics of the Modal Markers Cf. Krifka (to appear) 2016 A Presuppositional Analysis of Realis and Potentialis Modality in Daakie (Port Vato), Ambrym, Vanuatu, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26. General setup: Modus-less proposition, e.g. [ vp Enet koliet] Enet sing, φ, true at world/time i iff φ sings at i. Finiteness by modal marker: [ TP Enet [[mo] [t Enet koliet]]] RE(φ) Realis marker: [ TP Enet [[mo] [t Enet koliet]]] RE(φ): proposition true at i iff φ is true at i or at a world/time i before i. and defined only if φ is true at i or at a world/time i before i. (presupposition). Explains the factive interpretation of realis embedded clauses. RE(φ) is still informative in root clauses. Realis negation marker: [ TP Enet [[tere] [t Enet koliet]]] RNEG(φ): proposition true at i iff φ is false at any i before or equal to i and defined only if φ is in fact false at any i before or equal to i. Explains the factive interpretation of irrealis negation embedded clauses. 42 / 38 The Semantics of the Modal Markers Potentialis marker: [ TP Enet [[bo] [t Enet koliet]]] POT(φ): proposition true at i iff φ is true at at least one world/time i after i. and defined only if φ is true at at least one world/time i after i. Explains the potential interpretation of potential embedded clause Explains the futurate use of potential root clauses Future prefix a-, complementizer ka: Quantification over all future world/time pairs Distal marker: [ TP Enet [[te] [t Enet koliet]]] DST(φ): proposition true at i iff φ is true at some world/time i, with i i Pragmatic principle of maximize presupposition: Use RE, RNEG, POT when possible Blocks the use of distal except in counterfactual cases Distal as temporal anchor: Introduces reference time different from speech time i. N marker: [ TP Enet [[ne] [t Enet koliet]]] N(φ) has the same truth conditions as φ: N(φ) is true at i iff φ is true at i. but with an anti-factive restriction; N(φ) defined for i only if φ is false at i. Hence N(φ) can only be used in negative contexts that involve N(φ) N(φ) does not relate φ to the world/time of utterance, hence it cannot be used as a standard negation for this: RNEG(φ), it can only occur embedded by a negative-entailing predicate and/or complementizer that creats a relation to the world/time of utterance The rare deontic use of N(φ) is possible only if φ is in fact not true, but if it is expressed that φ should be true. 43 / 38
Advertisements
Related Documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x